GeForce GT 240M LE vs 8800 GTS 112
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
| GPU code name | G80 | G96C |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 19 November 2007 (18 years ago) | 15 January 2010 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 112 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 681 million | 314 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 28.00 | 9.600 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.2688 TFLOPS | 0.096 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 20 | 8 |
| TMUs | 28 | 16 |
| L2 Cache | 80 KB | 32 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 640 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 12.8 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 November 2007 | 15 January 2010 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 640 MB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 23 Watt |
8800 GTS 112 has a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.
GT 240M LE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 63.6% more advanced lithography process, and 552.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and GeForce GT 240M LE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GT 240M LE is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
