GeForce 8800 GTS 112 vs 9650M GS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1238not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.70no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG84G80
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2008 (17 years ago)19 November 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32112
Core clock speed625 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors289 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate10.0028.00
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs820
TMUs1628
L2 Cache32 KB80 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB640 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2008 19 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 640 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 150 Watt

9650M GS has an age advantage of 3 months, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 417.2% lower power consumption.

8800 GTS 112, on the other hand, has a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9650M GS and GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9650M GS is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
GeForce 9650M GS
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9650M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 309 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9650M GS or GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.