GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition vs 8800 GTS 512

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking980not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Power efficiency0.75no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG92G84
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 December 2007 (16 years ago)17 April 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 $159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12832
Core clock speed650 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors754 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate41.609.600
Floating-point processing power0.416 TFLOPS0.0928 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs6416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length254 mm170 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed820 MHz750 MHz
Memory bandwidth52.48 GB/s24 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.11.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 December 2007 17 April 2007
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 47 Watt

8800 GTS 512 has an age advantage of 7 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 23.1% more advanced lithography process.

8600 GT Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 187.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS 512 and GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 123 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.