GeForce2 Ultra vs GeForce 8800 GTS 320

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1497
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameG80NV15 A4
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 February 2007 (17 years ago)14 August 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed513 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors681 million25 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)143 Wattno data
Texture fill rate24.622.000
Floating-point processing power0.2281 TFLOPSno data
ROPs204
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x
Length267 mm183 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount320 MB64 MB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed792 MHz230 MHz
Memory bandwidth63.36 GB/s7.36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)7.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 February 2007 14 August 2000
Maximum RAM amount 320 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 180 nm

8800 GTS 320 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and GeForce2 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra
GeForce2 Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 26 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 35 votes

Rate GeForce2 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.