ATI Radeon HD 5450 vs GeForce 8800 GS

Place in the ranking	1133	1287
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.56	1.26
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	G92	Cedar
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	31 January 2008 (16 years ago)	4 February 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	80
Core clock speed	550 MHz	650 MHz
Number of transistors	754 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	105 Watt	19 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.40	5.200
Floating-point processing power	0.264 TFLOPS	0.104 TFLOPS
ROPs	12	4
TMUs	48	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	229 mm	170 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	384 MB	2 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	38.4 GB/s	6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x S-Video	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.0
OpenGL	3.3	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	1.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8800 GS 0.86
+146%

ATI HD 5450 0.35

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8800 GS 330
+143%

ATI HD 5450 136

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.86	0.35
Recency	31 January 2008	4 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount	384 MB	2 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	105 Watt	19 Watt

8800 GS has a 145.7% higher aggregate performance score.

ATI HD 5450, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 452.6% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 8800 GS is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5450 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.