Radeon HD 5450 vs GeForce 9800 GTX

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	846	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.08	no data
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	G92	Cedar
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	28 March 2008 (16 years ago)	4 February 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$299	no data
Current price	$151 (0.5x MSRP)	$205

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	80
CUDA cores	128	no data
Core clock speed	675 MHz	650 MHz
Number of transistors	754 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	140 Watt	19 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	43.2 billion/sec	5.200
Floating-point performance	432.1 gflops	104 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	10.5" (26.7 cm)	170 mm
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
SLI options	+	no data

Memory type	GDDR3	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1100 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	70.4 GB/s	6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	HDTVDual Link DVI	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	Via Adapter	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF	no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.0
OpenGL	2.1	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & Cons Summary

---

Recency	28 March 2008	4 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	2 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	140 Watt	19 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---