GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs 8700M GT

Place in the ranking	1308	271
Place by popularity	not in top-100	61
Power efficiency	0.76	27.76
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	G84	TU116
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 June 2007 (17 years ago)	23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	1024
Core clock speed	625 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	289 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	80 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	29 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.00	95.04
Floating-point processing power	0.08 TFLOPS	3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	16	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-HE	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.5
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.140
CUDA	1.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8700M GT 0.32

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.23
+6222%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8700M GT 124

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+6187%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

8700M GT 2026

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517
+2048%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	0−1	58
1440p	0−1	47
4K	-0−1	22

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−2850%

59
+2850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1933%	61 +1933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2550%	53 +2550%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2200%	46 +2200%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1175%	51 +1175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2163%	181 +2163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1575%	65−70 +1575%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −618%	201 +618%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2250%	47 +2250%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1700%	36 +1700%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1150%	50 +1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2150%	180 +2150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1775%	75 +1775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −400%	45−50 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −554%	183 +554%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −800%	27 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1450%	31 +1450%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1600%	34 +1600%
Hitman 3	4−5 −975%	43 +975%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −700%	64 +700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1475%	63 +1475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −333%	39 +333%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +27.3%	22 −27.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	16
Hitman 3	6−7 −367%	28 +367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −1950%	40−45 +1950%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1550%

30−35
+1550%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	10−11

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−800%

18−20
+800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	49 +0%	49 +0%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry 5	69 +0%	69 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	84 +0%	84 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Metro Exodus	91 +0%	91 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 +0%	44 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	32 +0%	32 +0%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry 5	58 +0%	58 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	59 +0%	59 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Metro Exodus	79 +0%	79 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	39 +0%	39 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	15 +0%	15 +0%
Far Cry 5	39 +0%	39 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	38 +0%	38 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Far Cry 5	26 +0%	26 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120 +0%	120 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	20 +0%	20 +0%
Hitman 3	16 +0%	16 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	42 +0%	42 +0%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 +0%	25 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 +0%	6 +0%
Far Cry 5	12 +0%	12 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 8700M GT is 27% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 2850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

8700M GT is ahead in 1 test (1%)
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 28 tests (40%)
there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.32	20.23
Recency	1 June 2007	23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	80 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	29 Watt	50 Watt

8700M GT has 72.4% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 6221.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8700M GT in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.