GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs 8200M G mGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated324
Place by popularitynot in top-10085
Power efficiencyno data28.63
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameC79TU116
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)23 April 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161024
Core clock speed400 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors314 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20095.04
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 23 April 2020
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 50 Watt

8200M G mGPU has 316.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1957 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel or GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.