ATI Radeon HD 5470 vs GeForce 8700M GT SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8700M GT SLI with Radeon HD 5470, including specs and performance data.

8700M GT SLI
2007
1 GB GDDR3, 58 Watt
0.73
+14.1%

8700M SLI outperforms HD 5470 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12211248
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.972.59
ArchitectureG8x (2007)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameNB8E-SECedar
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 September 2007 (18 years ago)13 February 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6480
Core clock speed625 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors578 Million292 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt19 Watt
Texture fill rateno data5.200
Floating-point processing powerno data0.104 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1011.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Valorant 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Valorant 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 0.64
Recency 18 September 2007 13 February 2012
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 19 Watt

8700M GT SLI has a 14.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI HD 5470, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 205.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 8700M GT SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5470 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8700M GT SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 5470 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI
GeForce 8700M GT SLI
ATI Radeon HD 5470
Radeon HD 5470

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate GeForce 8700M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 45 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8700M GT SLI or Radeon HD 5470, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.