Quadro P4200 vs GeForce 8700M GT SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 8700M GT SLI with Quadro P4200, including specs and performance data.
P4200 outperforms 8700M GT SLI by a whopping 3082% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1147 | 211 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 0.95 | 17.52 |
Architecture | G8x (2007) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
GPU code name | NB8E-SE | GP104 |
Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 18 September 2007 (17 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 64 | 2304 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1227 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1647 MHz |
Number of transistors | 578 Million | 7,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 16 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 58 Watt | 100 Watt |
Texture fill rate | no data | 237.2 |
Floating-point processing power | no data | 7.589 TFLOPS |
ROPs | no data | 64 |
TMUs | no data | 144 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | large | large |
Interface | no data | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1502 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 192.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 10 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
Vulkan | - | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | - | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1267%
|
40−45
+1267%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−1000%
|
55−60
+1000%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−1600%
|
50−55
+1600%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1267%
|
40−45
+1267%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 55−60 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−6500%
|
65−70
+6500%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−920%
|
50−55
+920%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−867%
|
110−120
+867%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 65−70 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−232%
|
100−110
+232%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−1000%
|
55−60
+1000%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−1600%
|
50−55
+1600%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1267%
|
40−45
+1267%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 55−60 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−6500%
|
65−70
+6500%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−920%
|
50−55
+920%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−867%
|
110−120
+867%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 65−70 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−440%
|
50−55
+440%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−232%
|
100−110
+232%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−1000%
|
55−60
+1000%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−1600%
|
50−55
+1600%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1267%
|
40−45
+1267%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 55−60 |
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−920%
|
50−55
+920%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−867%
|
110−120
+867%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−440%
|
50−55
+440%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−232%
|
100−110
+232%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 65−70 |
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 45−50 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−3700%
|
35−40
+3700%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 24−27 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1500%
|
16−18
+1500%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−2800%
|
27−30
+2800%
|
Hitman 3 | 7−8
−329%
|
30−33
+329%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
−1200%
|
50−55
+1200%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 30−35 |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
−7000%
|
140−150
+7000%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−1300%
|
40−45
+1300%
|
4K
High Preset
Far Cry New Dawn | 0−1 | 20−22 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−1400%
|
14−16
+1400%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 14−16 |
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−1000%
|
21−24
+1000%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 7000% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Quadro P4200 is ahead in 35 tests (58%)
- there's a draw in 25 tests (42%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.79 | 25.14 |
Recency | 18 September 2007 | 21 February 2018 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Chip lithography | 80 nm | 16 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 58 Watt | 100 Watt |
8700M GT SLI has 72.4% lower power consumption.
Quadro P4200, on the other hand, has a 3082.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.
The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8700M GT SLI in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce 8700M GT SLI is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.