GRID K500 vs GeForce 8500 GT
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1317 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.03 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
| GPU code name | G86 | GK104 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 17 April 2007 (18 years ago) | 2 July 2014 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | $3,599 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 1536 ×2 |
| Core clock speed | 459 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 210 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 3.672 | 95.36 ×2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.02938 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 4 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 8 | 128 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 32 KB | 512 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 4 GB ×2 |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 256 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit ×2 |
| Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s ×2 |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.1 | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 April 2007 | 2 July 2014 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 225 Watt |
8500 GT has 650% lower power consumption.
GRID K500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 8500 GT and GRID K500. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 8500 GT is a desktop graphics card while GRID K500 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
