GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs GRID K500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGK104G98
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 July 2014 (11 years ago)4 December 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536 ×28
Core clock speed745 MHz567 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36 ×24.536
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS ×20.0224 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×24
TMUs128 ×28
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm170 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×2512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s ×26.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.01.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 July 2014 4 December 2007
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 25 Watt

GRID K500 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

8400 GS Rev. 2, on the other hand, has 800% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K500 and GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K500 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K500
GRID K500
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 7 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K500 or GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.