GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a vs GRID K500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGK104C78
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 July 2014 (11 years ago)6 May 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536 ×216
Core clock speed745 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36 ×24.000
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS ×20.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×24
TMUs128 ×28
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 July 2014 6 May 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 40 Watt

GRID K500 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

8100 + nForce 720a, on the other hand, has 462.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K500 and GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K500 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K500
GRID K500
NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 18 votes

Rate GeForce 8100 nForce 720a on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K500 or GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.