Radeon RX 7700 XT vs GeForce 8400M GT

Place in the ranking	1411	39
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	71.32
Power efficiency	0.83	16.34
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	G86	Navi 32
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	9 May 2007 (17 years ago)	25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	3456
Core clock speed	450 MHz	1435 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2544 MHz
Number of transistors	210 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	80 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	245 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.600	549.5
Floating-point processing power	0.0288 TFLOPS	35.17 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	96
TMUs	8	216
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	600 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	19.2 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.0	6.7
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	1.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8400M GT 0.17

RX 7700 XT 58.39
+34247%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8400M GT 66

RX 7700 XT 22499
+33989%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	0−1	188
1440p	-0−1	103
4K	-0−1	60

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.39
1440p	no data	4.36
4K	no data	7.48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−9550%

193
+9550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −5400%	165 +5400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −5350%	100−110 +5350%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −7800%	158 +7800%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2850%	110−120 +2850%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2638%	210−220 +2638%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −5675%	230−240 +5675%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −425%	140−150 +425%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −8967%	272 +8967%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −5350%	100−110 +5350%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −6500%	132 +6500%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2850%	110−120 +2850%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2638%	210−220 +2638%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −8250%	334 +8250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1233%	120−130 +1233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −425%	140−150 +425%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −3933%	121 +3933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −5350%	100−110 +5350%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −6000%	122 +6000%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2850%	110−120 +2850%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2600%	216 +2600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −7075%	287 +7075%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1767%	168 +1767%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −425%	140−150 +425%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	80
Hitman 3	6−7 −1250%	80−85 +1250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −8450%	171 +8450%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−4800%

95−100
+4800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −5700%	58 +5700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	59

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−2750%

55−60
+2750%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	180 +0%	180 +0%
Battlefield 5	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	149 +0%	149 +0%
Battlefield 5	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	132 +0%	132 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	231 +0%	231 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

+0%

110−120

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	98 +0%	98 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	101 +0%	101 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Metro Exodus	134 +0%	134 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	193 +0%	193 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120 +0%	120 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Hitman 3	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Metro Exodus	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	89 +0%	89 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 +0%	36 +0%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	134 +0%	134 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	97 +0%	97 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 7700 XT is 9550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 7700 XT is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.17	58.39
Recency	9 May 2007	25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	12 GB
Chip lithography	80 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	245 Watt

8400M GT has 1650% lower power consumption.

RX 7700 XT, on the other hand, has a 34247.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400M GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M GT is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.