GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs 8400M GS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8400M GS and GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8400M GS
2007, $15
256 MB DDR2, 11 Watt
0.25

RTX 2060 Mobile outperforms 8400M GS by a whopping 10864% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1428236
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.7518.33
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG86TU106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)29 January 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161920
Core clock speed400 MHz960 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors210 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200144.0
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs8120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30
L1 Cacheno data1.9 MB
L2 Cache16 KB3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceMXM-IPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.17.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1104
1440p0−166
4K-0−142

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1080%
55−60
+1080%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3500%
108
+3500%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1080%
55−60
+1080%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2343%
171
+2343%
Valorant 24−27
−792%
223
+792%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−1977%
270−280
+1977%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%
Dota 2 9−10
−1211%
118
+1211%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3467%
107
+3467%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1080%
55−60
+1080%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2000%
147
+2000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2120%
111
+2120%
Valorant 24−27
−684%
196
+684%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%
Dota 2 9−10
−1144%
112
+1144%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2833%
88
+2833%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1080%
55−60
+1080%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1500%
112
+1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1100%
60
+1100%
Valorant 24−27
−392%
123
+392%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−1967%
60−65
+1967%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5733%
170−180
+5733%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−7200%
70−75
+7200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−4600%
45−50
+4600%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Valorant 1−2
−17000%
171
+17000%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−3700%
38
+3700%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1600%
34
+1600%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Fortnite 162
+0%
162
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Far Cry 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Fortnite 144
+0%
144
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+0%
90
+0%
Metro Exodus 56
+0%
56
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Far Cry 5 84
+0%
84
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 113
+0%
113
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
Valorant 212
+0%
212
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 63
+0%
63
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 74
+0%
74
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 87
+0%
87
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 Mobile is 17000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Mobile performs better in 30 tests (45%)
  • there's a draw in 36 tests (55%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 27.41
Recency 9 May 2007 29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 115 Watt

8400M GS has 945.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 10864% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400M GS in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
GeForce 8400M GS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 46 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1943 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400M GS or GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.