GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs 8200M G
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 8200M G and GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 2060 Mobile outperforms 8200M G by a whopping 17113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1462 | 226 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 18.24 |
| Architecture | no data | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | MCP77MV MCP79MVL | TU106 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 3 June 2008 (17 years ago) | 29 January 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1200 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 10,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 115 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 144.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 4.608 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 48 |
| TMUs | no data | 120 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 240 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 30 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 336.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10 | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 0−1 | 104 |
| 1440p | -0−1 | 66 |
| 4K | -0−1 | 41 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 60−65 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−3500%
|
108
+3500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−2343%
|
171
+2343%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−829%
|
223
+829%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10−12
−2364%
|
270−280
+2364%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−1375%
|
118
+1375%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−3467%
|
107
+3467%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−2000%
|
147
+2000%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−2120%
|
111
+2120%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−717%
|
196
+717%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−1300%
|
112
+1300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−2833%
|
88
+2833%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−1500%
|
112
+1500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−1100%
|
60
+1100%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−413%
|
123
+413%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−3050%
|
60−65
+3050%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−8650%
|
170−180
+8650%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−7300%
|
70−75
+7300%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−260%
|
50−55
+260%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−17000%
|
171
+17000%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−3700%
|
38
+3700%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−1600%
|
34
+1600%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 104
+0%
|
104
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 96
+0%
|
96
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 162
+0%
|
162
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 104
+0%
|
104
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 91
+0%
|
91
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 144
+0%
|
144
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 90
+0%
|
90
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 56
+0%
|
56
+0%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 98
+0%
|
98
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 84
+0%
|
84
+0%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 113
+0%
|
113
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35
+0%
|
35
+0%
|
| Valorant | 212
+0%
|
212
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 75
+0%
|
75
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 63
+0%
|
63
+0%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 74
+0%
|
74
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 39
+0%
|
39
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 42
+0%
|
42
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 87
+0%
|
87
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 33
+0%
|
33
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 Mobile is 17000% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 2060 Mobile is ahead in 21 tests (34%)
- there's a draw in 40 tests (66%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.16 | 27.54 |
| Recency | 3 June 2008 | 29 January 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 12 nm |
RTX 2060 Mobile has a 17112.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
