GeForce2 Go 100 vs GeForce 8400 GS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameG86NV11 B2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 April 2007 (17 years ago)6 February 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29.99 no data
Current price$125 (4.2x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed459 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistors210 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6 billion/sec0.5
Floating-point performance29.376 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 MB
Standard memory config per GPU256 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz332 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s1.328 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)7.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.11.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 6 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 2 Watt

8400 GS has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce2 Go 100, on the other hand, has 1900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400 GS and GeForce2 Go 100. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
GeForce 8400 GS
NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 100
GeForce2 Go 100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 547 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate GeForce2 Go 100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.