RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs GeForce 8300 GS

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8300 GS with RTX 4000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

8300 GS
2007
128 MB DDR2, 40 Watt
0.30

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms 8300 GS by a whopping 21160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking133029
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.5133.62
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG86AD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 April 2007 (17 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores86144
Core clock speed459 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2175 MHz
Number of transistors210 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate3.672417.6
Floating-point processing power0.01469 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs8192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB20 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s360.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8300 GS 0.30
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 63.78
+21160%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8300 GS 115
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 24572
+21267%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 63.78
Recency 17 April 2007 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 20 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 130 Watt

8300 GS has 225% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 21160% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 15900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8300 GS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8300 GS is a desktop card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS
GeForce 8300 GS
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 38 votes

Rate GeForce 8300 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 42 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.