Radeon RX 7700 vs GeForce 820M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 820M with Radeon RX 7700, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 820M
2013
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.28

RX 7700 outperforms 820M by a whopping 4394% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking102843
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.1420.71
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF117Navi 32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 November 2013 (10 years ago)2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$479

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores963072
Core clock speed625 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2600 MHz
Number of transistors585 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate10.00499.2
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 820M 1.28
RX 7700 57.52
+4394%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 820M 494
RX 7700 22192
+4392%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−4233%
650−700
+4233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−4233%
260−270
+4233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%
Hitman 3 6−7
−4233%
260−270
+4233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−4186%
600−650
+4186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−4294%
1450−1500
+4294%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−4233%
260−270
+4233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%
Hitman 3 6−7
−4233%
260−270
+4233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−4186%
600−650
+4186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−3991%
450−500
+3991%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−4294%
1450−1500
+4294%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−4233%
260−270
+4233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%
Hitman 3 6−7
−4233%
260−270
+4233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−4186%
600−650
+4186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−3991%
450−500
+3991%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−4294%
1450−1500
+4294%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Hitman 3 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−4233%
260−270
+4233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%

This is how GeForce 820M and RX 7700 compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700 is 4233% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 57.52
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

GeForce 820M has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

RX 7700, on the other hand, has a 4393.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 820M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 820M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GeForce 820M
AMD Radeon RX 7700
Radeon RX 7700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 811 votes

Rate GeForce 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 12 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.