Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB vs GeForce 820A

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking945not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGF117GV100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 March 2014 (10 years ago)27 March 2018 (6 years ago)
Current price$238 $16028

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores965120
Core clock speed775 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1530 MHz
Number of transistors585 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate12.40489.6
Floating-point performance297.6 gflops14,029 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s897.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.17.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 27 March 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce 820A and Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 820A is a desktop card while Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 820A
GeForce 820A
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 42 votes

Rate GeForce 820A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.