Radeon RX 560X Mobile vs GeForce 8200M G
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 8200M G and Radeon RX 560X Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
560X Mobile outperforms 8200M G by a whopping 6140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1478 | 484 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 11.66 |
| Architecture | no data | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | MCP77MV MCP79MVL | Polaris 21 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 3 June 2008 (17 years ago) | 11 April 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1275 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1202 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 65 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 81.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 2.611 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 16 |
| TMUs | no data | 64 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 1024 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | no data | MXM-B (3.0) |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1450 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 92.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2.131 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 0−1 | 34 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2200%
|
23
+2200%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−520%
|
31
+520%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1600%
|
17
+1600%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−1633%
|
52
+1633%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−360%
|
23
+360%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−614%
|
50
+614%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−296%
|
95−100
+296%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10−12
−1009%
|
122
+1009%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1400%
|
15
+1400%
|
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−788%
|
71
+788%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−1533%
|
49
+1533%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−260%
|
18
+260%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−500%
|
42
+500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−620%
|
36
+620%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−296%
|
95−100
+296%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1200%
|
13
+1200%
|
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−725%
|
66
+725%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−1167%
|
38
+1167%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−140%
|
12
+140%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−329%
|
30
+329%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−340%
|
22
+340%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−296%
|
95−100
+296%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−850%
|
18−20
+850%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−2600%
|
50−55
+2600%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−50%
|
21−24
+50%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−5200%
|
50−55
+5200%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 52
+0%
|
52
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 39
+0%
|
39
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 66
+0%
|
66
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 34
+0%
|
34
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 44
+0%
|
44
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 36
+0%
|
36
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 44
+0%
|
44
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 31
+0%
|
31
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 36
+0%
|
36
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 20
+0%
|
20
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 39
+0%
|
39
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 33
+0%
|
33
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 33
+0%
|
33
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 560X Mobile is 5200% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 560X Mobile performs better in 30 tests (45%)
- there's a draw in 36 tests (55%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 9.36 |
| Recency | 3 June 2008 | 11 April 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 14 nm |
RX 560X Mobile has a 6140% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 560X Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
