ATI Radeon X300 vs GeForce 810M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1088not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.97no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameGF117RV370
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 March 2014 (10 years ago)1 September 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed738 MHz375 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors585 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt36 Watt
Texture fill rate5.9041.500
Floating-point processing power0.1417 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 March 2014 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 36 Watt

GeForce 810M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 810M and Radeon X300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 810M is a notebook card while Radeon X300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 810M
GeForce 810M
ATI Radeon X300
Radeon X300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 504 votes

Rate GeForce 810M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 32 votes

Rate Radeon X300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.