NVIDIA GeForce 810M vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
 
not rated
Value for money (0-100)
0.35
 
no data
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
 
TeraScale
GPU code name
GF117
 
RV630
Market segment
Desktop
 
Desktop
Launch date
24 March 2014 (7 years ago)
 
28 June 2007 (14 years ago)
Price now
$163
 
no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
 
120
Core clock speed
738 MHz
 
594 MHz
Boost clock speed
950 MHz
 
no data
Number of transistors
585 million
 
390 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
65 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt
 
35 Watt
Texture fill rate
5.904
 
4.752
Floating-point performance
141.7 gflops
 
142.56 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
 
AGP 8x
Supplementary power connectors
no data
 
None

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
DDR3
 
DDR2
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
 
512 MB
Memory bus width
64 Bit
 
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
 
792 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
 
12.67 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
No outputs
 
1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX
12 (11_0)
 
10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model
5.1
 
4.0
OpenGL
4.6
 
3.3
OpenCL
1.1
 
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
 
N/A
CUDA
2.1
 
-

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 810M 397 +260.9%
ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP 110

Competitors of GeForce 810M from AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce 810M from AMD is Radeon E4690.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce 810M:

Competitors of Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP from NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP from NVIDIA is GeForce 810M.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP:

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 810M

Much newer (24 March 2014 vs 28 June 2007)

Higher memory bandwidth (14.4 vs 12.67 GB/s)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 65 nm)

Lower power consumption (15W vs 35W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

Advantages of ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

Wider memory bus (128 vs 64 bit)

More pipelines (120 vs 48)

So, which one is the better GPU?

Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA GeForce 810M and ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 810M
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
Like
Like

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.