ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP vs GeForce 810A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking930not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.90no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameGK208R420
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)1 May 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed719 MHz520 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHzno data
Number of transistors915 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt63 Watt
Texture fill rate12.138.320
Floating-point processing power0.2911 TFLOPSno data
ROPs816
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz560 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s35.84 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 1 May 2004
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 63 Watt

GeForce 810A has an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 320% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 810A and Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 810A is a notebook card while Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 810A
GeForce 810A
ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP
Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 14 votes

Rate GeForce 810A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X800 XT Platinum AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.