Radeon RX 560X Mobile vs GeForce 810A
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 810A and Radeon RX 560X Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
560X Mobile outperforms 810A by a whopping 532% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 990 | 480 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 7.97 | 11.61 |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
GPU code name | GK208 | Polaris 21 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 22 July 2014 (11 years ago) | 11 April 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 719 MHz | 1275 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 758 MHz | 1202 MHz |
Number of transistors | 915 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 | 81.60 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.2911 TFLOPS | 2.611 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 8 | 16 |
TMUs | 16 | 64 |
L1 Cache | 32 KB | 256 KB |
L2 Cache | 128 KB | 1024 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | large |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 92.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
FreeSync | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.5 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 5−6
−580%
| 34
+580%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 23
+0%
|
23
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 31
+0%
|
31
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
Battlefield 5 | 52
+0%
|
52
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 17
+0%
|
17
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 39
+0%
|
39
+0%
|
Fortnite | 66
+0%
|
66
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 52
+0%
|
52
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 34
+0%
|
34
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 23
+0%
|
23
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50
+0%
|
50
+0%
|
Valorant | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
Full HD
High
Battlefield 5 | 44
+0%
|
44
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 122
+0%
|
122
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 71
+0%
|
71
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 36
+0%
|
36
+0%
|
Fortnite | 44
+0%
|
44
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 49
+0%
|
49
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 31
+0%
|
31
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 36
+0%
|
36
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 20
+0%
|
20
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 42
+0%
|
42
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 36
+0%
|
36
+0%
|
Valorant | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 39
+0%
|
39
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 66
+0%
|
66
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 33
+0%
|
33
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 38
+0%
|
38
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 12
+0%
|
12
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30
+0%
|
30
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 22
+0%
|
22
+0%
|
Valorant | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
Fortnite | 33
+0%
|
33
+0%
|
1440p
High
Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Valorant | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
Fortnite | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
4K
High
Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Valorant | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
4K
Epic
Fortnite | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
This is how GeForce 810A and RX 560X Mobile compete in popular games:
- RX 560X Mobile is 580% faster in 1080p
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.48 | 9.35 |
Recency | 22 July 2014 | 11 April 2018 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
GeForce 810A has 333.3% lower power consumption.
RX 560X Mobile, on the other hand, has a 531.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 560X Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 810A in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.