Radeon RX 550X Mobile vs GeForce 810A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
710M 805A 810A 825M GT 720M GT 730A GT 735M GT 740A GT 740M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
540 540X 550 Mobile 550X Mobile 560 Mobile 560X Mobile 570 Mobile 570X Mobile 580 Mobile 580X Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 810A and Radeon RX 550X Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 810A
2014
2 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.48

550X Mobile outperforms 810A by a whopping 257% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GeForce 810A GeForce 810A
RX 550X Mobile RX 550X Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking990642
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.988.54
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGK208Polaris 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)11 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192640
Core clock speed719 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHz1287 MHz
Number of transistors915 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate12.1351.48
Floating-point processing power0.2911 TFLOPS1.647 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1640
L1 Cache32 KB160 KB
L2 Cache128 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7−8
−271%
26
+271%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 53
+0%
53
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+0%
20
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 49
+0%
49
+0%
Far Cry 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how GeForce 810A and RX 550X Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 550X Mobile is 271% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.48 5.28
Recency 22 July 2014 11 April 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

GeForce 810A has 233.3% lower power consumption.

RX 550X Mobile, on the other hand, has a 256.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 550X Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 810A in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 810A
GeForce 810A
AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile
Radeon RX 550X Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce 810A GeForce 810A
vs
HD 6740G2 Radeon HD 6740G2
RX 550X Mobile Radeon RX 550X Mobile
vs
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
GeForce 810A GeForce 810A
vs
R5 M430 Radeon R5 M430
HD 7470A Radeon HD 7470A
vs
550X 640SP Radeon 550X 640SP
HD 7670A Radeon HD 7670A
vs
HD 7670 OEM HD 7670 OEM
Radeon E6760 Radeon E6760
vs
GeForce4 MX 460 MX 460
GTX 950M Mac Edition GTX 950M Mac Edition
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB 1050 Mobile 3 GB
GTX 960A GeForce GTX 960A
vs
MX150 GP107 GeForce MX150 GP107
GT 730A GeForce GT 730A
vs
7600 GT GeForce 7600 GT
GT 640M Mac Edition GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
vs
Gemini Lake GT1 5 Lake GT1 5
GT 1030 GeForce GT 1030
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 Plus Graphics 650
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
205 OEM GeForce 205 OEM
S9300 X2 FirePro S9300 X2
vs
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1.8 15 votes

Rate GeForce 810A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 38 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 810A or Radeon RX 550X Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.