PG506-232 vs GeForce 7950 GT AGP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG71GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 April 2007 (17 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed500 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1440 MHz
Number of transistors278 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00322.6
Floating-point processing powerno data10.32 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs24224
Tensor Coresno data224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit3072 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s933.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)N/A
Shader Model3.0N/A
OpenGL2.1N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2007 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 165 Watt

7950 GT AGP has 153.8% lower power consumption.

PG506-232, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7950 GT AGP and PG506-232. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7950 GT AGP is a desktop card while PG506-232 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GT AGP
GeForce 7950 GT AGP
NVIDIA PG506-232
PG506-232

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 7 votes

Rate GeForce 7950 GT AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate PG506-232 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.