Tesla C1060 vs GeForce 7900 GT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1183not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.96no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG71GT200B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date9 March 2006 (18 years ago)9 April 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data240
Core clock speed450 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors278 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rate10.8048.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs2480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 March 2006 9 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 188 Watt

7900 GT has 291.7% lower power consumption.

Tesla C1060, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7900 GT and Tesla C1060. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7900 GT is a desktop card while Tesla C1060 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT
GeForce 7900 GT
NVIDIA Tesla C1060
Tesla C1060

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 41 vote

Rate GeForce 7900 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla C1060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.