GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs 7900 GS

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1184not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.93no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG71TU116
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 May 2006 (18 years ago)7 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$259 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data896
Core clock speed450 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1590 MHz
Number of transistors278 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate9.00089.04
Floating-point processing powerno data2.849 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs2056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length198 mm229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s192.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2006 7 July 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 80 Watt

7900 GS has 63.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 TU116, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7900 GS and GeForce GTX 1650 TU116. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS
GeForce 7900 GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 41 vote

Rate GeForce 7900 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 77 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.