Tesla K20s vs GeForce 7300 GS

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameG72GK110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 January 2006 (18 years ago)18 February 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,199

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2496
Core clock speed450 MHz575 MHz
Number of transistors112 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate1.800119.6
Floating-point processing powerno data2.87 TFLOPS
ROPs240
TMUs4208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB5 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed266 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.256 GB/s208.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 January 2006 18 February 2013
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 5 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 225 Watt

7300 GS has 878.3% lower power consumption.

Tesla K20s, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7300 GS and Tesla K20s. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7300 GS is a desktop card while Tesla K20s is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS
GeForce 7300 GS
NVIDIA Tesla K20s
Tesla K20s

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 84 votes

Rate GeForce 7300 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Tesla K20s on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.