GeForce GTX 2050 / 1150 / Ti Mobile vs 7300 GS Low Profile

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameG72no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 January 2006 (18 years ago)no data
Current price$45 $180

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data896
Core clock speed450 MHzno data
Number of transistors112 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)23 Wattno data
Texture fill rate1.800no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile and GeForce GTX 2050 / 1150 / Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6?
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed532 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth4.256 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12_1
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/Ano data

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile and GeForce GTX 2050 / 1150 / Ti Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 2050 / 1150 / Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile
GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 2050 / 1150 / Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 2050 / 1150 / Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 57 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 2050 / 1150 / Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.