Quadro T600 Mobile vs GeForce 7150M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 7150M with Quadro T600 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 7150M
2006
0.04

T600 Mobile outperforms 7150M by a whopping 39675% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1539354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data32.18
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameC67TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2006 (19 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3896
Core clock speed1 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speed425 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data78.96
Floating-point processing powerno data2.527 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data56
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeshared MemoryGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXshared Memory12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 7150M 0.04
T600 Mobile 15.91
+39675%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 7150M 18
Samples: 149
T600 Mobile 7032
+38967%
Samples: 454

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−151

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−814%
60−65
+814%
Valorant 24−27
−458%
130−140
+458%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−2311%
210−220
+2311%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−1557%
116
+1557%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−814%
60−65
+814%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1200%
52
+1200%
Valorant 24−27
−458%
130−140
+458%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−1429%
107
+1429%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−814%
60−65
+814%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−600%
28
+600%
Valorant 24−27
−39483%
9500−9550
+39483%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−37400%
750−800
+37400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−107%
30−35
+107%
Valorant 1−2
−9500%
95−100
+9500%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 63
+0%
63
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 45
+0%
45
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T600 Mobile is 9500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile performs better in 22 tests (43%)
  • there's a draw in 29 tests (57%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.04 15.91
Recency 1 February 2006 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm

T600 Mobile has a 39675% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T600 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7150M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 7150M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7150M
GeForce 7150M
NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 30 votes

Rate GeForce 7150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 37 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7150M or Quadro T600 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.