Quadro T1200 Mobile vs GeForce 7150M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7000M 7000M + nForce 610M 7150M 7150M + nForce 630M 7190M 8400M GS 8400M GT 8600M GS 8600M GT 9300M GS 9400M 9600M GT
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 7150M with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 7150M
2006
0.04

T1200 Mobile outperforms 7150M by a whopping 43025% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GeForce 7150M GeForce 7150M
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1543347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data73.91
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameC67TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2006 (19 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores31024
Core clock speed1 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed425 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rateno data91.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.918 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeshared MemoryGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXshared Memory12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−158
1440p-0−133
4K-0−181

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−3500%
70−75
+3500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1017%
65−70
+1017%
Valorant 21−24
−496%
130−140
+496%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−2356%
220−230
+2356%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−1529%
114
+1529%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−3500%
70−75
+3500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1017%
65−70
+1017%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1320%
71
+1320%
Valorant 21−24
−496%
130−140
+496%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−1429%
107
+1429%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−3500%
70−75
+3500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1017%
65−70
+1017%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−640%
37
+640%
Valorant 21−24
−42943%
9900−9950
+42943%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−42400%
850−900
+42400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 1−2
−3600%
35−40
+3600%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4300%
40−45
+4300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−39900%
400−450
+39900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−129%
30−35
+129%
Valorant 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High

Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 9900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile performs better in 19 tests (38%)
  • there's a draw in 31 tests (62%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.04 17.25
Recency 1 February 2006 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm

T1200 Mobile has a 43025% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7150M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 7150M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 7150M
GeForce 7150M
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce 7150M GeForce 7150M
vs
ATI Mobility X700 XL Mobility Radeon X700 XL
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
GeForce 7150M GeForce 7150M
vs
RX 490M Radeon RX 490M
GeForce 7190M GeForce 7190M
vs
RX 590 RX 590
GeForce 7190M GeForce 7190M
vs
Radeon 610M Radeon 610M
GeForce 7190M GeForce 7190M
vs
RX 7900M RX 7900M
GeForce 7190M GeForce 7190M
vs
RTX 5090 RTX 5090
GeForce 7150M GeForce 7150M
vs
ATI V4800 FirePro V4800
ATI Xpress 1150 Radeon Xpress 1150
vs
GTS 450 Rev. 3 GTS 450 Rev. 3
Go 6150 GeForce Go 6150
vs
RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
Go 6150 GeForce Go 6150
vs
Radeon 890M Radeon 890M
GeForce 7000M GeForce 7000M
vs
Arctic Sound 1T Sound 1T
GeForce 7000M GeForce 7000M
vs
Radeon 610M Radeon 610M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 30 votes

Rate GeForce 7150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 159 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7150M or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.