H3C XG310 vs GeForce 7150M + nForce 630M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameC67DG1
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date16 November 2007 (18 years ago)11 November 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768 ×4
Core clock speed425 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors112 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rate0.8552.80 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data1.69 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs224 ×4
TMUs248 ×4
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB ×4
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2133 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data68.26 GB/s ×4
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 November 2007 11 November 2020
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm

H3C XG310 has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7150M + nForce 630M and H3C XG310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7150M + nForce 630M is a notebook graphics card while H3C XG310 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7150M + nForce 630M
GeForce 7150M + nForce 630M
Intel H3C XG310
H3C XG310

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 15 votes

Rate GeForce 7150M nForce 630M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate H3C XG310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7150M + nForce 630M or H3C XG310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.