PG506-232 vs GeForce 7150M + nForce 630M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameC67GA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date16 November 2007 (18 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed425 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1440 MHz
Number of transistors112 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data165 Watt
Texture fill rate0.85322.6
Floating-point processing powerno data10.32 TFLOPS
ROPs296
TMUs2224
Tensor Coresno data224
L1 Cacheno data10.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data24 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared3072 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1215 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data933.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)N/A
Shader Model3.0N/A
OpenGL2.1N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 November 2007 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm

PG506-232 has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7150M + nForce 630M and PG506-232. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7150M + nForce 630M is a notebook graphics card while PG506-232 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7150M + nForce 630M
GeForce 7150M + nForce 630M
NVIDIA PG506-232
PG506-232

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 15 votes

Rate GeForce 7150M nForce 630M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate PG506-232 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7150M + nForce 630M or PG506-232, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.