H3C XG310 vs GeForce 9600M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1324not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.31no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameG96CDG1
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 June 2008 (17 years ago)11 November 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32768 ×4
Core clock speed120 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors314 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00052.80 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS1.69 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs824 ×4
TMUs1648 ×4
L2 Cache32 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB ×4
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed800 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s68.26 GB/s ×4
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2008 11 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 300 Watt

9600M GT has 1204.3% lower power consumption.

H3C XG310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600M GT and H3C XG310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9600M GT is a notebook graphics card while H3C XG310 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
GeForce 9600M GT
Intel H3C XG310
H3C XG310

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 106 votes

Rate GeForce 9600M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate H3C XG310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600M GT or H3C XG310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.