Radeon RX 6600S vs GeForce 705M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 705M and Radeon RX 6600S, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 705M
2013
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.16

RX 6600S outperforms 705M by a whopping 2626% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1075177
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.4327.76
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF119Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 September 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481792
Core clock speed475 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors292 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate3.800224.0
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPS7.168 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Standard memory configurationDDR3no data
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 2560x1600no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 2560x1600no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 705M 1.16
RX 6600S 31.62
+2626%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 705M 455
RX 6600S 12444
+2635%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−2800%
85−90
+2800%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−700%
60−65
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2167%
65−70
+2167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−2800%
85−90
+2800%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−11100%
110−120
+11100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−700%
60−65
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2167%
65−70
+2167%
Fortnite 2−3
−6850%
130−140
+6850%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1867%
110−120
+1867%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Valorant 30−35
−479%
190−200
+479%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−2800%
85−90
+2800%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−11100%
110−120
+11100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−700%
60−65
+700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−954%
270−280
+954%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2167%
65−70
+2167%
Dota 2 16−18
−738%
130−140
+738%
Fortnite 2−3
−6850%
130−140
+6850%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1867%
110−120
+1867%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 100−110
Metro Exodus 1−2
−6800%
65−70
+6800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1840%
95−100
+1840%
Valorant 30−35
−479%
190−200
+479%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−11100%
110−120
+11100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−700%
60−65
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2167%
65−70
+2167%
Dota 2 16−18
−738%
130−140
+738%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1867%
110−120
+1867%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1840%
95−100
+1840%
Valorant 30−35
−479%
190−200
+479%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−6850%
130−140
+6850%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−3367%
200−210
+3367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2400%
170−180
+2400%
Valorant 3−4
−7500%
220−230
+7500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3100%
30−35
+3100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7000%
70−75
+7000%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2600%
80−85
+2600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−2550%
50−55
+2550%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Valorant 6−7
−2917%
180−190
+2917%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 14−16
Dota 2 0−1 90−95
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6600S is 11100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600S is ahead in 46 tests (72%)
  • there's a draw in 18 tests (28%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.16 31.62
Recency 27 September 2013 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 80 Watt

GeForce 705M has 433.3% lower power consumption.

RX 6600S, on the other hand, has a 2625.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600S is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 705M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 705M
GeForce 705M
AMD Radeon RX 6600S
Radeon RX 6600S

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 16 votes

Rate GeForce 705M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 705M or Radeon RX 6600S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.