Radeon RX 6300 vs GeForce 610M

Place in performance ranking	1118	333
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.13	no data
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	N13M-GE	Navi 24
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	6 December 2011 (12 years ago)	no data
Current price	$55	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	768
CUDA cores	48	no data
Core clock speed	672 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	900 MHz	2040 MHz
Number of transistors	292 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	32 Watt
Texture fill rate	Up to 7.2 billion/sec	97.92
Floating-point performance	129.02 gflops	no data
Video decoders	H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 610M and Radeon RX 6300 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x4
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64bit	32 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	Up to 14.4 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	2x HDMI 2.1
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 610M 0.75

RX 6300 14.86
+1881%

Radeon RX 6300 outperforms GeForce 610M by 1881% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 610M 291

RX 6300 5741
+1873%

Radeon RX 6300 outperforms GeForce 610M by 1873% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−1733%

55−60
+1733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1800%	95−100 +1800%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Hitman 3	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −1809%	210−220 +1809%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −1789%	170−180 +1789%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1800%	95−100 +1800%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Hitman 3	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −1809%	210−220 +1809%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −1789%	170−180 +1789%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1800%	95−100 +1800%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −1809%	210−220 +1809%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5

0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −1775%	75−80 +1775%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −1775%	75−80 +1775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%