Radeon 625 vs GeForce 610M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 610M and Radeon 625, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 610M
2011
1 GB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.74

625 outperforms 610M by a whopping 269% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1166807
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.313.84
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGF119Polaris 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 December 2011 (13 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48384
Core clock speed738 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1024 MHz
Number of transistors292 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate5.90424.58
Floating-point processing power0.1417 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
Video decodersH.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080pno data
ROPs48
TMUs824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 14.4 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 610M 0.74
Radeon 625 2.73
+269%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 610M 290
Radeon 625 1073
+270%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Valorant 27−30
−51.7%
40−45
+51.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Dota 2 12−14
−100%
24−27
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Valorant 27−30
−51.7%
40−45
+51.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Dota 2 12−14
−100%
24−27
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Valorant 27−30
−51.7%
40−45
+51.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−533%
18−20
+533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 625 is 533% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 625 is ahead in 36 tests (62%)
  • there's a draw in 22 tests (38%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 2.73
Recency 1 December 2011 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 50 Watt

GeForce 610M has 316.7% lower power consumption.

Radeon 625, on the other hand, has a 268.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 625 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 610M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 610M
GeForce 610M
AMD Radeon 625
Radeon 625

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 760 votes

Rate GeForce 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 146 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 610M or Radeon 625, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.