GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs 410M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 410M and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 410M
2011
Up to 512 MB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.59

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms 410M by a whopping 3741% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1189221
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Power efficiency3.8823.87
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF119GA106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2011 (14 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482560
Core clock speed575 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1035 MHz
Number of transistors292 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate4.60082.80
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPS5.299 TFLOPS
Gigaflops73no data
ROPs448
TMUs880
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL+4.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 410M 0.59
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 22.66
+3741%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 410M 264
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10127
+3736%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 410M 415
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 18057
+4251%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−825%
74
+825%
1440p1−2
−4100%
42
+4100%
4K0−126

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−4600%
94
+4600%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3000%
62
+3000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−3450%
71
+3450%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2850%
59
+2850%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2350%
95−100
+2350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1100%
95−100
+1100%
Valorant 27−30
−479%
160−170
+479%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−2000%
42
+2000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−1263%
250−260
+1263%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2150%
45
+2150%
Dota 2 12−14
−883%
118
+883%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2350%
95−100
+2350%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−5600%
57
+5600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1100%
95−100
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2200%
92
+2200%
Valorant 27−30
−479%
160−170
+479%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40
+1900%
Dota 2 12−14
−842%
113
+842%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2350%
95−100
+2350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1100%
95−100
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1150%
50
+1150%
Valorant 27−30
−286%
112
+286%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−8550%
170−180
+8550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2817%
170−180
+2817%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 22
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−3100%
60−65
+3100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−5800%
55−60
+5800%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 18−20
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−193%
44
+193%
Valorant 4−5
−3525%
140−150
+3525%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−2000%
21
+2000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 94
+0%
94
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 74
+0%
74
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+0%
94
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Far Cry 5 68
+0%
68
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+0%
41
+0%
Metro Exodus 34
+0%
34
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Far Cry 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 21
+0%
21
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+0%
29
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 54
+0%
54
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how GeForce 410M and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 825% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 4100% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 8550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 31 test (51%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (49%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.59 22.66
Recency 5 January 2011 11 May 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 75 Watt

GeForce 410M has 525% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3740.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 410M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 410M
GeForce 410M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 275 votes

Rate GeForce 410M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4398 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 410M or GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.