GeForce MX450 vs 410M

Place in performance ranking	1143	426
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.01	no data
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N12M-GS	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	6 January 2011 (13 years ago)	1 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price	$163	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	896
CUDA cores	48	no data
Core clock speed	575 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1575 MHz
Number of transistors	292 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	4.600	100.8
Floating-point performance	110.4 gflops	no data
Gigaflops	73	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 410M and GeForce MX450 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	Up to 512 MB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz	10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	12.8 GB/s	64.03 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	no data	+
Power management	8.0	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	+	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 410M 0.66

GeForce MX450 9.64
+1361%

MX450 outperforms 410M by 1361% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 410M 257

GeForce MX450 3732
+1352%

MX450 outperforms 410M by 1352% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 410M 1923

GeForce MX450 22831
+1088%

MX450 outperforms 410M by 1088% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 410M 415

GeForce MX450 8250
+1888%

MX450 outperforms 410M by 1888% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GeForce 410M 1027

GeForce MX450 29145
+2738%

MX450 outperforms 410M by 2738% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	8 −263%	29 +263%
1440p	1−2 −1500%	16 +1500%
4K	1−2 −2400%	25 +2400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−967%

32
+967%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −225%	24−27 +225%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −633%	22 +633%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −667%	23 +667%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −433%	32 +433%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −225%	24−27 +225%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −333%	13 +333%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −900%	10 +900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −66.7%	5 +66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −233%	20 +233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −1000%	33 +1000%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8 +167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −567%	20 +567%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −600%	14−16 +600%
Hitman 3	3−4 −500%	18 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +14.3%	7 −14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −225%	13 +225%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1900%	20 +1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Hitman 3	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%

This is how GeForce 410M and GeForce MX450 compete in popular games:

GeForce MX450 is 263% faster than GeForce 410M in 1080p
GeForce MX450 is 1500% faster than GeForce 410M in 1440p
GeForce MX450 is 2400% faster than GeForce 410M in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce 410M is 14.3% faster than the GeForce MX450.
in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX450 is 1900% faster than the GeForce 410M.

All in all, in popular games: