UHD Graphics vs GeForce 320M

Place in performance ranking	1226	599
Place by popularity	not in top-100	7
Architecture	GT2xx (2009−2012)	Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code name	MCP89	Jasper Lake GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 April 2010 (14 years ago)	11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	256
Core clock speed	450 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	750 MHz
Number of transistors	486 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	10 Watt
Texture fill rate	7.200	12.00
Floating-point performance	0.0912 gflops	0.384 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	Ring Bus
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bus width	no data	System Shared
Memory clock speed	no data	System Shared
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 320M 0.54

UHD Graphics 5.57
+931%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 320M 209

UHD Graphics 2151
+929%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−900%

230−240
+900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−900%

30−33
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −900%	50−55 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −900%	60−65 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −900%	300−310 +900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −900%	50−55 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −900%	60−65 +900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −900%	300−310 +900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −900%	50−55 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −900%	60−65 +900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −900%	300−310 +900%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−900%

10−11
+900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Hitman 3	6−7 −900%	60−65 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−900%

30−33
+900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3
−800%

18−20

+800%

This is how GeForce 320M and UHD Graphics compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics is 900% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.54	5.57
Recency	1 April 2010	11 January 2021
Chip lithography	40 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	10 Watt

UHD Graphics has a 931.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 130% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 320M is a notebook card while UHD Graphics is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.