ATI Radeon X800 PRO vs GeForce 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 320M with Radeon X800 PRO, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 320M
2010
23 Watt
0.47
+236%

320M outperforms X800 PRO by a whopping 236% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12861477
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.650.24
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameC89R423
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2010 (15 years ago)1 May 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed450 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors486 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt48 Watt
Texture fill rate7.2005.700
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs812
TMUs1612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared450 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 320M 0.47
+236%
ATI X800 PRO 0.14

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 320M 209
+227%
Samples: 124
ATI X800 PRO 64
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24
+243%
7−8
−243%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Valorant 27−30
+238%
8−9
−238%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Valorant 27−30
+238%
8−9
−238%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Valorant 27−30
+238%
8−9
−238%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Valorant 3−4 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

This is how GeForce 320M and ATI X800 PRO compete in popular games:

  • GeForce 320M is 243% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 0.14
Recency 1 April 2010 1 May 2004
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 48 Watt

GeForce 320M has a 235.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 225% more advanced lithography process, and 108.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 320M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X800 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 320M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X800 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GeForce 320M
ATI Radeon X800 PRO
Radeon X800 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 66 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon X800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 320M or Radeon X800 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.