Radeon RX 7900M vs GeForce 320M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 320M and Radeon RX 7900M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX 7900M outperforms GeForce 320M by a whopping 10509% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 1185 | 34 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GT2xx (2009−2012) | RDNA 3 |
| GPU code name | MCP89 | Navi 31 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 April 2010 (14 years ago) | 19 October 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 4608 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 1825 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2090 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 486 million | 57,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | 180 Watt (160 - 200 Watt TGP) |
| Texture fill rate | 7.200 | 601.9 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on GeForce 320M and Radeon RX 7900M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 18000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 576.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Radeon RX 7900M outperforms GeForce 320M by 10509% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Radeon RX 7900M outperforms GeForce 320M by 10480% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 13
−1015%
| 145
+1015%
|
| 1440p | 1−2
−11200%
| 113
+11200%
|
| 4K | 0−1 | 78 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−9900%
|
300−310
+9900%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−2875%
|
110−120
+2875%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−3500%
|
100−110
+3500%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−9900%
|
300−310
+9900%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−13700%
|
130−140
+13700%
|
| Hitman 3 | 5−6
−2260%
|
110−120
+2260%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
−2080%
|
210−220
+2080%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−3717%
|
220−230
+3717%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−390%
|
140−150
+390%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−2875%
|
110−120
+2875%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−3500%
|
100−110
+3500%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−9900%
|
300−310
+9900%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−13700%
|
130−140
+13700%
|
| Hitman 3 | 5−6
−2260%
|
110−120
+2260%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
−2080%
|
210−220
+2080%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−3717%
|
220−230
+3717%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−1090%
|
110−120
+1090%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−390%
|
140−150
+390%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−2875%
|
110−120
+2875%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−3500%
|
100−110
+3500%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−9900%
|
300−310
+9900%
|
| Hitman 3 | 5−6
−2260%
|
110−120
+2260%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
−2080%
|
210−220
+2080%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−5633%
|
344
+5633%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−1580%
|
168
+1580%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−390%
|
140−150
+390%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−8800%
|
85−90
+8800%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−9900%
|
100−105
+9900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−6600%
|
65−70
+6600%
|
| Hitman 3 | 6−7
−1250%
|
80−85
+1250%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 3−4
−4433%
|
130−140
+4433%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
−22800%
|
220−230
+22800%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−3167%
|
95−100
+3167%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−4300%
|
40−45
+4300%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 40−45 |
4K
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−2700%
|
55−60
+2700%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 100−105
+0%
|
100−105
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 220−230
+0%
|
220−230
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 100−105
+0%
|
100−105
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 220−230
+0%
|
220−230
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 100−105
+0%
|
100−105
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 220−230
+0%
|
220−230
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 270−280
+0%
|
270−280
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 100−105
+0%
|
100−105
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 249
+0%
|
249
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 210−220
+0%
|
210−220
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 116
+0%
|
116
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 131
+0%
|
131
+0%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
This is how GeForce 320M and RX 7900M compete in popular games:
- RX 7900M is 1015% faster in 1080p
- RX 7900M is 11200% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900M is 22800% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 7900M is ahead in 30 tests (47%)
- there's a draw in 34 tests (53%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.54 | 57.29 |
| Recency | 1 April 2010 | 19 October 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | 180 Watt |
GeForce 320M has 682.6% lower power consumption.
RX 7900M, on the other hand, has a 10509.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 7900M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 320M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
