Radeon RX 7600 XT vs GeForce 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 320M with Radeon RX 7600 XT, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 320M
2010
23 Watt
0.54

RX 7600 XT outperforms 320M by a whopping 8139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking121879
Place by popularitynot in top-10089
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data77.58
Power efficiency1.6316.28
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameC89Navi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2010 (14 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482048
Core clock speed450 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2755 MHz
Number of transistors486 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200352.6
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPS22.57 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data204 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 320M 0.54
RX 7600 XT 44.49
+8139%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 320M 209
RX 7600 XT 17163
+8112%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
−7900%
1600−1650
+7900%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data0.21

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7900%
240−250
+7900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−7900%
240−250
+7900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7900%
240−250
+7900%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−7900%
800−850
+7900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−7400%
450−500
+7400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−8067%
2450−2500
+8067%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−7900%
240−250
+7900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7900%
240−250
+7900%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−7900%
800−850
+7900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−7400%
450−500
+7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−7900%
800−850
+7900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−8067%
2450−2500
+8067%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−7900%
240−250
+7900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7900%
240−250
+7900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−7900%
800−850
+7900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−7400%
450−500
+7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−7900%
800−850
+7900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−8067%
2450−2500
+8067%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Hitman 3 6−7
−7400%
450−500
+7400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−7900%
240−250
+7900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−7900%
240−250
+7900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−7900%
160−170
+7900%

This is how GeForce 320M and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600 XT is 7900% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 44.49
Recency 1 April 2010 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 190 Watt

GeForce 320M has 726.1% lower power consumption.

RX 7600 XT, on the other hand, has a 8138.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 320M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GeForce 320M
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
Radeon RX 7600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 52 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 509 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.