GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 320M and GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 320M
2010
23 Watt
0.50

RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms 320M by a whopping 12736% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking129030
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.6841.44
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameC89AD103
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2010 (15 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores489728
Core clock speed450 MHz1335 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors486 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200515.3
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPS32.98 TFLOPS
ROPs8112
TMUs16304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76
L1 Cacheno data9.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data576.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 320M 0.50
RTX 4090 Mobile 64.18
+12736%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 320M 209
Samples: 124
RTX 4090 Mobile 27089
+12861%
Samples: 2585

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 320M 1852
RTX 4090 Mobile 113387
+6022%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24
−608%
170
+608%
1440p1−2
−12900%
130
+12900%
4K0−179

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14600%
147
+14600%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14100%
142
+14100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6350%
250−260
+6350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2075%
170−180
+2075%
Valorant 27−30
−1270%
350−400
+1270%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1535%
270−280
+1535%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−13200%
133
+13200%
Dota 2 10−12
−1709%
199
+1709%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6350%
250−260
+6350%
Metro Exodus 0−1 156
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2075%
170−180
+2075%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−6467%
394
+6467%
Valorant 27−30
−1270%
350−400
+1270%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−12700%
128
+12700%
Dota 2 10−12
−1600%
187
+1600%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6350%
250−260
+6350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2075%
170−180
+2075%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−3300%
204
+3300%
Valorant 27−30
−1270%
350−400
+1270%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−5667%
173
+5667%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−25700%
516
+25700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−3400%
170−180
+3400%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−11050%
220−230
+11050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−8100%
164
+8100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 150−160

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1129%
172
+1129%
Valorant 3−4
−10900%
300−350
+10900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4700%
95−100
+4700%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 240
+0%
240
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 181
+0%
181
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 214
+0%
214
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 167
+0%
167
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 174
+0%
174
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 158
+0%
158
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 138
+0%
138
+0%
Metro Exodus 117
+0%
117
+0%
Valorant 485
+0%
485
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+0%
95
+0%
Far Cry 5 151
+0%
151
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 88
+0%
88
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 314
+0%
314
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150
+0%
150
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Dota 2 179
+0%
179
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 107
+0%
107
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

This is how GeForce 320M and RTX 4090 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 608% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 12900% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4090 Mobile is 25700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 Mobile performs better in 28 tests (44%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (56%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 64.18
Recency 1 April 2010 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 120 Watt

GeForce 320M has 421.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 12736% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 320M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GeForce 320M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 66 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 852 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 320M or GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.