GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 320M and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 320M
2010
23 Watt
0.50

RTX 3050 Mobile outperforms 320M by a whopping 4254% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1270275
Place by popularitynot in top-10044
Power efficiency1.6622.12
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameC89GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2010 (15 years ago)11 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482048
Core clock speed450 MHz712 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1057 MHz
Number of transistors486 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate7.20067.65
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPS4.329 TFLOPS
ROPs840
TMUs1664
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 320M 0.50
RTX 3050 Mobile 21.77
+4254%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 320M 209
RTX 3050 Mobile 9122
+4265%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 320M 1852
RTX 3050 Mobile 77234
+4070%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24
−288%
93
+288%
1440p1−2
−5000%
51
+5000%
4K0−132

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−10500%
106
+10500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8200%
83
+8200%
Far Cry 5 0−1 118
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2125%
85−90
+2125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−975%
85−90
+975%
Valorant 27−30
−485%
150−160
+485%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1365%
240−250
+1365%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6000%
61
+6000%
Dota 2 10−12
−1436%
169
+1436%
Far Cry 5 0−1 107
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2125%
85−90
+2125%
Metro Exodus 0−1 62
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−975%
85−90
+975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−3260%
168
+3260%
Valorant 27−30
−485%
150−160
+485%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6000%
61
+6000%
Dota 2 10−12
−1309%
155
+1309%
Far Cry 5 0−1 99
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2125%
85−90
+2125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−975%
85−90
+975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1200%
65
+1200%
Valorant 27−30
−485%
150−160
+485%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−2250%
45−50
+2250%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−15800%
150−160
+15800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−3380%
170−180
+3380%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−5500%
55−60
+5500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 50−55

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−280%
57
+280%
Valorant 3−4
−4200%
120−130
+4200%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Sons of the Forest 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Sons of the Forest 60
+0%
60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 94
+0%
94
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 128
+0%
128
+0%
Sons of the Forest 56
+0%
56
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Sons of the Forest 65
+0%
65
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 57
+0%
57
+0%
Metro Exodus 36
+0%
36
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
Sons of the Forest 40
+0%
40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 23
+0%
23
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+0%
44
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%
Dota 2 93
+0%
93
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Sons of the Forest 24
+0%
24
+0%

This is how GeForce 320M and RTX 3050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 288% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 5000% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 Mobile is 15800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Mobile is ahead in 26 tests (43%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (57%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 21.77
Recency 1 April 2010 11 May 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 75 Watt

GeForce 320M has 226.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 4254% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 320M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GeForce 320M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 64 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 5196 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 320M or GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.