GeForce RTX 2060 vs 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GeForce 320M
2010
23 Watt
0.54

RTX 2060 outperforms 320M by a whopping 6678% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1182119
Place by popularitynot in top-10034
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.04
ArchitectureGT2xx (2009−2012)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameMCP89Turing TU106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2010 (14 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349
Current price$408 $397 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GeForce 320M and RTX 2060 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores321920
Core clock speed450 MHz1320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistors486 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200201.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 320M and GeForce RTX 2060 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMIno data+
G-SYNC supportno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 320M 0.54
RTX 2060 36.60
+6678%

RTX 2060 outperforms 320M by 6678% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 320M 209
RTX 2060 14150
+6670%

RTX 2060 outperforms 320M by 6670% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 320M 1852
RTX 2060 60454
+3164%

RTX 2060 outperforms 320M by 3164% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−823%
120
+823%
1440p1−2
−7100%
72
+7100%
4K0−152

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2033%
60−65
+2033%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5200%
106
+5200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2033%
60−65
+2033%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−2750%
114
+2750%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−6900%
140
+6900%
Hitman 3 3−4
−2933%
90−95
+2933%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−1818%
211
+1818%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1438%
120−130
+1438%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−6400%
130
+6400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2033%
60−65
+2033%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1825%
75−80
+1825%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−6450%
131
+6450%
Hitman 3 3−4
−1500%
48
+1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−1464%
172
+1464%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−463%
45
+463%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−4433%
136
+4433%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3450%
71
+3450%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2033%
60−65
+2033%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1650%
70
+1650%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−5150%
105
+5150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−991%
120
+991%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−2333%
73
+2333%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1525%
65
+1525%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2700%
27−30
+2700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−6500%
65−70
+6500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−2867%
89
+2867%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−5000%
50−55
+5000%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 4−5
−1375%
55−60
+1375%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−5100%
52
+5100%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−950%
42
+950%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1800%
38
+1800%

This is how GeForce 320M and RTX 2060 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 is 823% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 is 7100% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2060 is 6900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2060 surpassed GeForce 320M in all 32 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 36.60
Recency 1 April 2010 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 175 Watt

The GeForce RTX 2060 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 320M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2060 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GeForce 320M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 50 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9323 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.