A10G vs GeForce 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 320M with A10G, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 320M
2010
23 Watt
0.50

A10G outperforms 320M by a whopping 6400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1289182
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.6716.63
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameC89GA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2010 (15 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores489216
Core clock speed450 MHz1320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1710 MHz
Number of transistors486 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200492.5
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPS31.52 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16288
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cacheno data9 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1563 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data600.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 320M 0.50
A10G 32.50
+6400%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 320M 209
Samples: 124
A10G 13598
+6406%
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24
−6358%
1550−1600
+6358%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6400%
260−270
+6400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−6150%
500−550
+6150%
Valorant 27−30
−6381%
1750−1800
+6381%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−6371%
1100−1150
+6371%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Dota 2 10−12
−6264%
700−750
+6264%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6400%
260−270
+6400%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−6150%
500−550
+6150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−5733%
350−400
+5733%
Valorant 27−30
−6381%
1750−1800
+6381%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Dota 2 10−12
−6264%
700−750
+6264%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6400%
260−270
+6400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−6150%
500−550
+6150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−5733%
350−400
+5733%
Valorant 27−30
−6381%
1750−1800
+6381%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−6233%
190−200
+6233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−6400%
130−140
+6400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−6400%
130−140
+6400%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−6400%
130−140
+6400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−6400%
130−140
+6400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6329%
900−950
+6329%
Valorant 3−4
−6233%
190−200
+6233%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−6400%
130−140
+6400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−6400%
130−140
+6400%

This is how GeForce 320M and A10G compete in popular games:

  • A10G is 6358% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 32.50
Recency 1 April 2010 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 150 Watt

GeForce 320M has 552.2% lower power consumption.

A10G, on the other hand, has a 6400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The A10G is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 320M is a notebook graphics card while A10G is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GeForce 320M
NVIDIA A10G
A10G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 66 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 49 votes

Rate A10G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 320M or A10G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.