Radeon HD 8180 vs GeForce 315M

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	GT2xx (2009−2012)	GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code name	N11M-GE	Temash
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 December 2010 (13 years old)	23 May 2013 (10 years old)
Current price	$163	no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	128
CUDA cores	16	no data
Core clock speed	606 MHz	225 MHz
Number of transistors	260 million	1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	4 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.848	1.800
Floating-point performance	38.78 gflops	no data
Gigaflops	73	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce 315M and Radeon HD 8180 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	IGP

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3, DDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	Up to 512 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	12.8 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	4.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Recency	1 December 2010	23 May 2013
Chip lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	4 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---